Soviet anti-tank artillery. Post-war and modern artillery

During the war, BS-3 was produced in small quantities and could not play a big role. At the final stage of the war, 98 BS-3s were assigned as a means of strengthening five tank armies. The gun was in service with light artillery brigades of 3 regiments.

As of January 1, 1945, the RGK artillery had 87 BS-3 guns. At the beginning of 1945, in the 9th Guards Army, one cannon artillery regiment of 20 BS-3s was formed in three rifle corps.

Mainly, thanks to its long firing range - 20,650 m and a fairly effective high-explosive fragmentation grenade weighing 15.6 kg, the gun was used as a hull gun to combat enemy artillery and suppress long-range targets.

BS-3 had a number of disadvantages that made it difficult to use as an anti-tank weapon. When firing, the gun jumped strongly, which made the gunner’s work unsafe and confused the sighting mounts, which, in turn, led to a decrease in the practical rate of aimed fire - a very important quality for a field anti-tank gun.

The presence of a powerful muzzle brake with a low height of the line of fire and flat trajectories characteristic of firing at armored targets led to the formation of a significant smoke and dust cloud, which unmasked the position and blinded the crew. The mobility of a gun with a mass of more than 3500 kg left much to be desired; transportation by crews to the battlefield was practically impossible.

After the war, the gun was in production until 1951 inclusive; a total of 3,816 BS-3 field guns were produced. In the 60s, the guns underwent modernization, this primarily concerned sights and ammunition. Until the early 60s, the BS-3 could penetrate the armor of any Western tank. But with the advent of: M-48A2, Chieftain, M-60 - the situation has changed. New sub-caliber and cumulative projectiles were urgently developed. The next modernization took place in the mid-80s, when the 9M117 Bastion anti-tank guided projectile was added to the BS-3 ammunition load.

This weapon was also supplied to other countries and took part in many local conflicts in Asia, Africa and the Middle East; in some of them it is still in service. In Russia, until recently, BS-3 guns were used as a coastal defense weapon in service with the 18th machine gun and artillery division stationed on Kuril Islands, and also quite a significant amount of them are in storage.

Until the late 60s and early 70s of the last century, anti-tank guns were the main means of fighting tanks. However, with the advent of ATGMs with a semi-automatic guidance system, which only requires keeping the target in the sight's field of view, the situation has largely changed. The military leadership of many countries considered metal-intensive, bulky and expensive anti-tank guns an anachronism. But not in the USSR. In our country, the development and production of anti-tank guns continued in significant quantities. And at a qualitatively new level.

From the author's book

The post-war problem of mines Although during the war years in all theaters of war the warring parties laid, according to various estimates, from 80 to 150 million mines, it cannot be assumed that approximately the same number of mines remained in the ground after the end of hostilities. Firstly, a significant part

From the author's book

Chapter 16 Modern Africa The history of the rise of modern PMCs actually began in Africa, when peacekeeping troops The UN in the 1990s showed its complete ineffectiveness in trying to stop or at least regulate armed conflicts, in many

From the author's book

Post-war Belarus Life in the first peaceful years (after the liberation of the territory from the Nazi invaders) in the western regions of Belarus can hardly be called calm. One of the Far Eastern security officers, recalling his work in the state security agencies, modestly and

From the author's book

Post-war history of the US "Comets" USAAF intelligence formed a special department dedicated to collecting information about German aircraft. The discovered aircraft were to be tested in the States. The department, called Air Technical Intelligence (ATI), initially consisted of 32 employees,

From the author's book

2. The first post-war campaign On May 29, 1906, while continuing to remain in Libau, “ships of the detachment of naval midshipmen,” as it was then called, began a campaign on orders from the General Staff. On the "Tsesarevich" they raised the braid pennant of the detachment commander, Captain 1st Rank I.F. Bostrom. For him

From the author's book

Post-war painting After the cessation of hostilities in Europe on vehicles of the 8th and 9th air fleets black code letters were applied to the lower surface of the left wing, like on the fuselage. Decorative elements gradually began to appear. Some parts included in

From the author's book

Post-war modernization After the war, the future of Jean Bart became the subject of serious discussion and study. In 1946, the cost of completing it as a battleship or converting it into an aircraft carrier was investigated. The last option required 5 billion francs ($100 million), but

From the author's book

Post-war transformation In the spring of 1945, the Bletchley Park estate most closely resembled educational institution ahead of the long holidays. Its inhabitants were mortally tired from long, grueling work. The intellectual load on them in the years of the Second

From the author's book

Post-war socialist economy The Great Patriotic War of 1941–1945 was victoriously completed with the complete defeat of Nazi Germany. Following the cessation of the war in Europe, with the defeat of Japanese imperialism, the war ended in Far East. Second

From the author's book

Post-war life The transition to peaceful life was easy for me. But it didn’t get any easier, that’s for sure. After all, what is a company commander after the war? Consider it the most hectic position - studies, exercises and even two parades a year are constantly going on. Then I once asked my wife: “When will you

From the author's book

17. Post-war policy Victory in the Great Patriotic War was achieved at a high price for our country. Human losses amounted to about 27 million people, in addition to this, the USSR lost almost a third of its national wealth. On Soviet soil completely or

From the author's book

Modern wheeled armored vehicles (See "TI V" No. 11-12/99) Armored car "Saladin" (Great Britain) Armored personnel carrier "Saracen" (Great Britain) BRM EE-9 "Cascavel" (Brazil) Armored car RAM V-1 (Israel) Armored car Fiat 6616 (Italy) APC "Walid" (Egypt) APC PSZH-IV (Hungary) APC "Fahd" with

From the author's book

Modern wheeled armored vehicles Mikhail NIKOLSKYContinued. Start see "Ti V" 11-12/99 GERMANY - NETHERLANDSWEGMANN/DAF MRS "FENNEK" BRM "Feniek" Light armored vehicle MRS (Multipurpuse Carrier - multi-purpose vehicle) was developed jointly by German and Dutch companies in

From the author's book

Modern wheeled armored vehicles Mikhail NIKOLSKYContinued. For the beginning, see “Ti V” 11-12/99, No. 2/2000 SHALOCKHEED “TWISTER” BA X-806 Armored vehicles of the famous aerospace company Lockheed have never been put into service anywhere, and no other combat vehicles have been developed on their basis

played one of critical roles in the defeat of Nazi Germany. No less important place was assigned to artillery and in ensuring the defense capability of the Soviet Union in the first post-war years.

Direct control, training, education and support of combat, operational-tactical and special training command and personnel of the artillery, the development of plans for the development and improvement of all artillery, as well as providing it with the necessary weapons and military equipment, was entrusted to the Commander of the Artillery of the Armed Forces of the USSR.

To implement the assigned tasks, the following management bodies were subordinate to the commander: Artillery Headquarters, Main Artillery Directorate, Combat Training Directorate, Directorate of Artillery Military Educational Institutions and Personnel Directorate. In addition, the artillery commander was responsible for developing the country's air defense plan and implementing measures to prepare the territory of the USSR for air defense. In this regard, the commander of the country's air defense forces was subordinate to him. Under the leadership of the Artillery Commander, Artillery Marshal N.N. Voronov prepared plans for the transfer of artillery to peacetime states and artillery weapons of the Soviet Army, the implementation of which began after the completion of demobilization of the personnel of the active army.

After the end of the Great Patriotic War The artillery of the Soviet Army has undergone significant changes. The number of artillery units increased due to the creation of additional formations in rifle corps and divisions. Each of the surviving rifle corps received at its disposal a corps artillery brigade consisting of cannon and howitzer artillery regiments (they were created, including through reformation from anti-tank ones), as well as a reconnaissance artillery division.

In addition, each of the corps included a guards mortar regiment and an anti-aircraft artillery division (then a regiment). The rifle divisions were reinforced with a mortar and howitzer regiment, and the existing artillery regiment began to be called a cannon regiment. All these regiments were combined into an artillery brigade. In addition, each of the divisions received at its disposal 2 more separate artillery divisions - anti-aircraft and self-propelled. In the late 1940s - early 1950s. A number of artillery formations and units were disbanded.

Thus, most of the artillery corps directorates and a number of divisions and brigades ceased to exist. The number of regiments also decreased, mainly due to their enlargement. At the same time, about 70% of the units remained (especially anti-aircraft artillery), and some separate brigades and the regiments were reduced or transformed into divisions. Thus, by 1948, 11 additional cannon divisions were formed from individual regiments and brigades. Changes also occurred in the composition of artillery divisions - the number of brigades and regiments decreased, and the division's command staff changed.

Thus, the anti-aircraft artillery divisions were transferred from a four-regiment structure to a three-regiment structure. Many of the compounds changed their numbers and partly their composition. Thus, in the first post-war years, the activities of the Artillery Commander were aimed at improving the organizational and staffing structure of artillery units, which resulted in their disaggregation, as well as the adoption of the latest artillery systems, communications equipment and various Vehicle, which contributed to increasing the mobility and firepower of artillery formations of the ground forces.

S.Yu. Kondratenko

On February 12, 1942, the most massive soviet gun The Great Patriotic War ZIS-3, which, along with the T-34 and PPSh-41, became one of the symbols of Victory.

76-mm divisional gun model 1942 (ZIS-3)

The ZIS-3 became the most popular weapon of the Great Patriotic War. The divisional gun, developed under the leadership of Vasily Gavrilovich Grabin, appeared at the front in the second half of 1942. Light and maneuverable, the ZIS-3 has found very wide application in the fight against both manpower and enemy equipment. The divisional gun turned out to be essentially universal, and most importantly, easy to master and produce, just at the moment when it was necessary to send the maximum possible number of guns to the active army in a short time. In total, more than 100 thousand ZIS-3 were produced - more than all other guns combined during the war.

37-mm anti-aircraft gun model 1939

Intended to destroy low-flying air targets. Food was supplied from a clip of five artillery rounds. But often in the initial period of the war these guns were also used as anti-tank weapons. In 1941, a gun with a high initial projectile velocity penetrated the armor of any German tanks. The disadvantage of the gun was that the failure of one of the gunners made shooting alone impossible. The second disadvantage is the lack of an armor shield, which was not originally provided for the anti-aircraft gun and appeared only in 1944. In total, at least 18 thousand 37-mm automatic anti-aircraft guns were produced

Howitzer-gun ML-20

A unique weapon that combined the firing range of a cannon and the ability of a howitzer to conduct flat fire. Not a single battle, including Moscow, Stalingrad, Kursk, and Berlin, was complete without the participation of these guns. At the same time, not a single army in the world, including the German one, had such systems in service at that time.
It is noteworthy that the ML-20 became the first Soviet weapon to open fire on German territory. On the evening of August 2, 1944, about 50 shells were fired from the ML-20 at German positions in East Prussia. And immediately a report was sent to Moscow that shells were now exploding on German territory. Since the middle of the war, the ML-20 was installed on both the Soviet self-propelled guns SU-152 and later on the ISU-152. In total, about 6,900 ML-20 guns of various modifications were produced.

ZIS-2 (57-mm anti-tank gun model 1941) is a weapon with a very difficult fate. One of two anti-tank guns of the USSR during the Great Patriotic War - the second was the “forty-five”. It appeared in 1941, but then there were simply no targets for this gun - any german tank The ZIS-2 was pierced through and through, and in the difficult conditions of transferring industry to a military footing, it was decided to abandon the production of a technologically complex and expensive weapon. We remembered the ZIS-2 in 1943, when heavy tanks appeared in the German troops. These guns were again at the front from the summer of 1943 to Kursk Bulge and subsequently proved themselves well, coping with almost any German tanks. At distances of several hundred meters, the ZIS-2 penetrated the 80-mm side armor of the Tigers.

85-mm anti-aircraft gun model 1939

During the Great Patriotic War, this weapon was very widely used both at the front and to protect rear facilities and large transport hubs. During the Great Patriotic War, 85-mm anti-aircraft guns destroyed up to 4 thousand enemy aircraft. During combat operations, this weapon was often used as an anti-tank weapon. And before the start of mass production of the ZIS-3, it was practically the only gun capable of fighting “tigers” at long distances. There is a well-known feat of the crew of senior sergeant G. A. Shadunts, who in two days of fighting in the area modern city Lobnya, Moscow region, destroyed 8 German tanks. Dedicated to this episode of the Battle of Moscow Feature Film"At your doorstep."

Universal ship artillery installation. On Soviet ships(for example, Kirov-class cruisers) was used as anti-aircraft artillery ranged combat. The gun was equipped with an armor shield. Firing range 22 km; ceiling – 15 km. Since it was impossible to track the movement of enemy aircraft with heavy guns, firing, as a rule, was carried out in curtains at a certain range. The weapon also turned out to be useful for hitting ground targets. In total, 42 guns were produced before the start of World War II. Since production was concentrated in Leningrad, which was under siege, the ships of the Pacific Fleet under construction were forced to equip not 100 mm, but 85 mm cannons as long-range artillery.

"Magpie"

The 45-mm anti-tank gun of the 1937 model was the main anti-tank weapon of the Red Army in the initial period of the war and was capable of hitting almost any German technology. Since 1942, its new modification (45-mm anti-tank gun model 1942) with an elongated barrel was adopted for service. Since the middle of the war, when the enemy began to use tanks with powerful armor protection, the main targets of the "magpies" were transporters and self-propelled guns and enemy firing points. On the basis of the 45-mm anti-tank gun, the 45-mm semi-automatic naval gun 21-K was also created, which turned out to be ineffective due to the low rate of fire and the lack of special sights. Therefore, whenever possible, 21-K was replaced with automatic cannons, transferring the removed artillery to strengthen positions ground troops as field and anti-tank guns.

After the end of the war, the USSR's anti-tank artillery armament included: 37-mm airborne guns of the 1944 model, 45-mm anti-tank guns mod. 1937 and arr. 1942, 57-mm anti-tank guns ZiS-2, divisional 76-mm ZiS-3, 100-mm field guns 1944 BS-3. Captured German 75-mm anti-tank guns Pak 40 were also used. They were purposefully collected, stored and repaired if necessary.

In mid-1944, the 37-mm airborne gun ChK-M1 was officially adopted.

It was specially designed to arm parachute battalions and motorcycle regiments. The gun weighed 209 kg in firing position and could be transported by air and parachuted. It had good armor penetration for its caliber, allowing it to hit the side armor of medium and heavy tanks with a sub-caliber projectile at short range. The shells were interchangeable with the 37 mm 61-K anti-aircraft gun. The gun was transported in Willys and GAZ-64 cars (one gun per car), as well as in Dodge and GAZ-AA cars (two guns per car).

In addition, it was possible to transport the weapon on a one-horse cart or sleigh, as well as in a motorcycle sidecar. If necessary, the gun can be disassembled into three parts.

The crew of the gun consisted of four people - a commander, a gunner, a loader and a carrier. When firing, the crew takes a prone position. The technical rate of fire reached 25-30 rounds per minute.
Thanks to the original design of recoil devices, the 37-mm airborne gun model 1944 combined powerful ballistics for its caliber anti-aircraft gun with small dimensions and weight. With armor penetration values close to those of the 45-mm M-42, the CheK-M1 is three times lighter and significantly smaller in size (much lower line of fire), which greatly facilitated the movement of the gun by crew forces and its camouflage. At the same time, the M-42 also has a number of advantages - the presence of a full-fledged wheel drive, allowing the gun to be towed by a car, the absence of a muzzle brake that unmasks when firing, a more effective fragmentation projectile and a better armor-piercing effect of armor-piercing projectiles.
The 37mm ChK-M1 gun was about 5 years late and was adopted and put into production when the war came to an end. Apparently she did not take part in the hostilities. A total of 472 guns were produced.

By the time the hostilities ended, 45-mm anti-tank guns were hopelessly outdated, even the presence in the ammunition load of the 45-mm M-42 gun of a sub-caliber projectile with normal armor penetration at a distance of 500 meters - 81-mm homogeneous armor could not correct the situation. Modern heavy and medium tanks were hit only when fired at the side, from extremely short distances. Active use of these tools until the very last days war can be explained by high maneuverability, ease of transportation and camouflage, huge accumulated reserves of ammunition of this caliber, as well as the inability of Soviet industry to provide troops in the required quantity with anti-tank guns with higher characteristics.
One way or another, in the active army the “forty-fives” were extremely popular; only they could move with crew forces in the battle formations of the advancing infantry, supporting them with fire.

At the end of the 40s, “forty-fives” began to be actively removed from parts and transferred for storage. However, for quite a long period of time they continued to remain in service with the Airborne Forces and were used as training weapons.
A significant number of 45 mm M-42s were transferred to the then allies.

American soldiers from the 5th Cavalry Regiment study an M-42 captured in Korea

"Sorokapyatka" was actively used in the Korean War. In Albania, these guns were in service until the early 90s.

Mass production of the 57-mm ZiS-2 anti-tank gun became possible in 1943, after the necessary metalworking machines were received from the United States. The restoration of serial production was difficult - technological problems with the manufacture of barrels again arose, in addition, the plant was heavily loaded with the production program of 76-mm divisional and tank guns, which had a number of common components with the ZIS-2; under these conditions, increasing the production of ZIS-2 using existing equipment could only be achieved by reducing the production volume of these weapons, which was unacceptable. As a result, the first batch of ZIS-2 for state and military tests was released in May 1943, and in the production of these guns, the reserve stock mothballed at the plant since 1941 was widely used. Mass production of the ZIS-2 was organized by October - November 1943, after the commissioning of new production facilities provided with equipment supplied under Lend-Lease.

The capabilities of the ZIS-2 made it possible, at typical combat distances, to confidently hit the 80-mm frontal armor of the most common German medium tanks Pz.IV and StuG III assault self-propelled guns, as well as the side armor of the Pz.VI Tiger tank; at distances less than 500 m was affected and frontal armor"Tiger".
In terms of cost and manufacturability of production, combat and service characteristics, the ZIS-2 became the best Soviet anti-tank gun during the war.
From the moment production resumed until the end of the war, more than 9,000 guns entered the troops, but this turned out to be not enough to fully equip fighter aircraft. anti-tank units.

Production of the ZiS-2 continued until 1949 inclusive; in the post-war period, about 3,500 guns were produced. From 1950 to 1951, only ZIS-2 barrels were produced. Since 1957, the previously produced ZIS-2s have been upgraded into the ZIS-2N variant with the ability to fight at night through the use of special night sights
In the 1950s, new sub-caliber projectiles with increased armor penetration were developed for the gun.

In the post-war period, the ZIS-2 was in service Soviet army at least until the 1970s, the last case combat use recorded in 1968, during the conflict with the PRC on Damansky Island.
ZIS-2 were supplied to a number of countries and took part in several armed conflicts, the first of which was Korean War.
There is information about the successful use of the ZIS-2 by Egypt in 1956 in battles with the Israelis. Guns of this type were in service Chinese army and were produced under license under the designation Type 55. As of 2007, ZIS-2 was still in service with the armies of Algeria, Guinea, Cuba and Nicaragua.

In the second half of the war, captured German 75-mm anti-tank guns Pak 40 were in service with the anti-tank destroyer units. During the offensive operations of 1943-1944, it was captured a large number of guns and ammunition for them. Our military appreciated the high performance of these anti-tank guns. At a distance of 500 meters, the sub-caliber projectile normally penetrated 154 mm armor.

In 1944, firing tables and operating instructions were issued for the Pak 40 in the USSR.
After the war, the guns were transferred to storage, where they remained at least until the mid-60s. Subsequently, some of them were “utilized”, and some were transferred to the allies.

A photograph of the RaK-40 guns was taken at a parade in Hanoi in 1960.

In fear of an invasion from the South, several anti-tank artillery divisions were formed within the North Vietnamese army, armed with German 75-mm PaK-40 anti-tank guns from World War II. Such guns were captured in large quantities in 1945 by the Red Army, and now Soviet Union provided them to the Vietnamese people for protection from possible aggression from the South.

Soviet divisional 76-mm guns were intended to solve a wide range of tasks, primarily fire support for infantry units, suppression of firing points, and destruction of light field shelters. However, during the war, divisional artillery guns had to fire on enemy tanks, perhaps even more often than specialized anti-tank guns.

Since 1944, due to a slowdown in the production of 45-mm guns and a shortage of 57-mm ZIS-2 guns, despite insufficient armor penetration for that time, the divisional 76-mm ZiS-3 became the main anti-tank gun of the Red Army.

In many ways, this was a forced measure. The armor penetration of an armor-piercing projectile that penetrated 75-mm armor at a distance of 300 meters along the normal was not enough to deal with medium German tanks Pz.IV.

As of 1943, reservation heavy tank PzKpfW VI "Tiger" was invulnerable to the ZIS-3 in the frontal projection and weakly vulnerable at distances closer than 300 m in the side projection. Weakly vulnerable in the frontal projection for the ZIS-3 were also the new German tank PzKpfW V Panther, as well as the upgraded PzKpfW IV Ausf H and PzKpfW III Ausf M or N; however, all these vehicles were confidently hit on the side by the ZIS-3.

The introduction of a sub-caliber projectile since 1943 improved the anti-tank capabilities of the ZIS-3, allowing it to confidently hit vertical 80-mm armor at distances closer than 500 m, but 100-mm vertical armor remained unbearable for it.
The relative weakness of the anti-tank capabilities of the ZIS-3 was recognized by the Soviet military leadership, but it was not possible to replace the ZIS-3 in anti-tank units until the end of the war. The situation could be corrected by introducing a cumulative projectile into the ammunition load. But such a projectile was adopted by the ZiS-3 only in the post-war period.

Shortly after the end of the war and the production of over 103,000 guns, the production of the ZiS-3 was discontinued. The gun remained in service for a long time, but by the end of the 40s, it was almost completely withdrawn from anti-tank artillery. This did not prevent the ZiS-3 from spreading very widely around the world and taking part in many local conflicts, including on the territory former USSR.

In the modern Russian army, the remaining serviceable ZIS-3s are often used as salute guns or in theatrical performances based on the battles of the Great Patriotic War. In particular, these guns are in service with the Separate Fireworks Division at the Moscow commandant’s office, which conducts fireworks on the holidays of February 23 and May 9.

In 1946, the 85-mm D-44 anti-tank gun, created under the leadership of chief designer F. F. Petrov, was put into service. This weapon would have been in great demand during the war, but its development was delayed for a number of reasons.
Externally, the D-44 strongly resembled the German 75-mm anti-tank Pak 40.

From 1946 to 1954, 10,918 guns were manufactured at Plant No. 9 (Uralmash).
D-44 were in service with a separate anti-tank artillery division of motorized rifle or tank regiment(two anti-tank artillery batteries consisting of two fire platoons) 6 pieces per battery (12 in a division).

The ammunition used is unitary cartridges with high-explosive fragmentation grenades, coil-shaped sub-caliber projectiles, cumulative and smoke projectiles. The range of a direct shot of the BTS BR-367 at a target 2 m high is 1100 m. At a distance of 500 m, this projectile penetrates an armor plate 135 mm thick at an angle of 90°. The initial speed of the BR-365P BPS is 1050 m/s, armor penetration is 110 mm from a distance of 1000 m.

In 1957, night sights were installed on some of the guns, and a self-propelled modification of the SD-44 was also developed, which could move on the battlefield without a tractor.

The barrel and carriage of the SD-44 were taken from the D-44 with minor changes. Thus, an M-72 engine from the Irbit Motorcycle Plant with a power of 14 hp, covered with a casing, was installed on one of the cannon frames. (4000 rpm) providing self-propulsion speeds of up to 25 km/h. Power transmission from the engine was provided through the driveshaft, differential and axle shafts to both wheels of the gun. The gearbox included in the transmission provided six forward gears and two gears reverse. The frame also has a seat for one of the crew numbers, which performs the functions of a driver. He has at his disposal a steering mechanism that controls an additional, third, gun wheel, mounted on the end of one of the frames. A headlight is installed to illuminate the road at night.

Subsequently, it was decided to use the 85-mm D-44 as a divisional one to replace the ZiS-3, and to entrust the fight against tanks to more powerful artillery systems and ATGMs.

In this capacity, the weapon was used in many conflicts, including in the CIS. An extreme case of combat use was noted in the North Caucasus, during the “counter-terrorist operation”.

The D-44 is still formally in service in the Russian Federation; a number of these guns are in the internal troops and in storage.

On the basis of the D-44, under the leadership of chief designer F.F. Petrov, the D-48 anti-tank 85-mm gun was created. The main feature of the D-48 anti-tank gun was its exceptionally long barrel. To ensure the maximum initial velocity of the projectile, the barrel length was increased to 74 calibers (6 m, 29 cm).
New unitary shots were created especially for this gun. An armor-piercing projectile at a distance of 1,000 m penetrated armor 150-185 mm thick at an angle of 60°. A sub-caliber projectile at a distance of 1000 m penetrates homogeneous armor 180–220 mm thick at an angle of 60° Maximum range firing high-explosive fragmentation shells weighing 9.66 kg. - 19 km.
From 1955 to 1957, 819 copies of the D-48 and D-48N were produced (with an APN2-77 or APN3-77 night sight).

The guns entered service with individual anti-tank artillery divisions of a tank or motorized rifle regiment. As an anti-tank weapon, the D-48 gun quickly became outdated. In the early 60s of the 20th century, tanks with more powerful armor protection appeared in NATO countries. Negative trait The D-48 became an “exclusive” ammunition, unsuitable for other 85-mm guns. For firing from the D-48, the use of shots from the D-44, KS-1, 85-mm tank and self-propelled guns is also prohibited; this significantly narrowed the scope of use of the gun.

In the spring of 1943, V.G. Grabin, in his memorandum addressed to Stalin, proposed, along with the resumption of production of the 57-mm ZIS-2, to begin designing a 100-mm cannon with a unitary shot, which was used in naval guns.

A year later, in the spring of 1944, the 100-mm field gun of the 1944 model BS-3 was put into production. Due to the presence of a wedge bolt with a vertically moving wedge with semi-automatic operation, the location of the vertical and horizontal aiming mechanisms on one side of the gun, as well as the use of unitary shots, the gun’s rate of fire is 8-10 rounds per minute. The cannon fired unitary cartridges with armor-piercing tracer shells and high-explosive fragmentation grenades. An armor-piercing tracer projectile with an initial speed of 895 m/s at a distance of 500 m at an impact angle of 90° penetrated armor 160 mm thick. The direct shot range was 1080 m.

However, the role of this weapon in the fight against enemy tanks is greatly exaggerated. By the time of its appearance, the Germans practically did not use tanks on a massive scale.

As of January 1, 1945, the RGK artillery had 87 BS-3 guns. At the beginning of 1945, in the 9th Guards Army, one cannon artillery regiment of 20 BS-3s was formed in three rifle corps.

This weapon was also supplied to other countries and took part in many local conflicts in Asia, Africa and the Middle East; in some of them it is still in service. In Russia, until recently, BS-3 guns were used as a coastal defense weapon in service with the 18th Machine Gun and Artillery Division stationed on the Kuril Islands, and quite a significant number of them are in storage.

In 1961, the T-12 100-mm smoothbore anti-tank gun, developed at the Yurginsky Machine-Building Plant No. 75 design bureau under the leadership of V.Ya., entered service. Afanasyev and L.V. Korneeva.

The decision to make a smoothbore gun at first glance may seem quite strange; the time of such guns ended almost a hundred years ago. But the creators of the T-12 did not think so.

In a smooth channel, you can make the gas pressure much higher than in a threaded channel, and accordingly increase initial speed projectile.
In a rifled barrel, the rotation of the projectile reduces the armor-piercing effect of the jet of gases and metal during the explosion of the cumulative projectile.
For a smoothbore gun, the survivability of the barrel is significantly increased - you don’t have to worry about the so-called “washing out” of the rifling fields.

The gun channel consists of a chamber and a cylindrical smooth-walled guide part. The chamber is formed by two long and one short (between them) cones. The transition from the chamber to the cylindrical section is a conical slope. The shutter is vertical wedge with spring semi-automatic. Loading is unitary. The carriage for the T-12 was taken from the 85 mm D-48 anti-tank rifled gun.

In the 60s, a more convenient carriage was designed for the T-12 cannon. New system received the index MT-12 (2A29), and in some sources it is called “Rapier”. The MT-12 went into mass production in 1970. The anti-tank artillery battalions of the motorized rifle divisions of the USSR Armed Forces included two anti-tank artillery batteries consisting of six 100-mm T-12 anti-tank guns (MT-12).

The T-12 and MT-12 guns have the same combat unit- a long thin barrel 60 calibers long with a muzzle brake - “salt shaker”. The sliding beds are equipped with an additional retractable wheel installed at the openers. The main difference of the modernized MT-12 model is that it is equipped with a torsion bar suspension, which is locked when firing to ensure stability.

When rolling the gun manually, a roller is placed under the trunk part of the frame, which is secured with a stopper on the left frame. Transportation of T-12 and MT-12 guns is carried out by a standard MT-L or MT-LB tractor. For movement on snow, the LO-7 ski mount was used, which made it possible to fire from skis at elevation angles of up to +16° with a rotation angle of up to 54°, and at an elevation angle of 20° with a rotation angle of up to 40°.

Smooth trunk much more convenient for shooting guided missiles, although in 1961 this was most likely not yet thought about. To combat armored targets, an armor-piercing sub-caliber projectile is used with a swept warhead, which has high kinetic energy and is capable of penetrating 215 mm thick armor at a distance of 1000 meters. The ammunition load includes several types of sub-caliber, cumulative and high-explosive fragmentation shells.

Shot ZUBM-10 with armor-piercing projectile

Shot ZUBK8 with a cumulative projectile

When a special guidance device is installed on the gun, shots with the Kastet anti-tank missile can be used. The missile is controlled semi-automatically by a laser beam, the firing range is from 100 to 4000 m. The missile penetrates armor behind dynamic protection (“reactive armor”) up to 660 mm thick.

Rocket 9M117 and shot ZUBK10-1

For direct fire, the T-12 cannon is equipped with a day sight and night sights. With a panoramic sight it can be used as a field weapon from closed positions. There is a modification of the MT-12R gun with a mounted 1A31 "Ruta" guidance radar.

MT-12R with 1A31 "Ruta" radar

The gun was massively in service with the armies of the Warsaw Pact countries, was supplied to Algeria, Iraq and Yugoslavia. They took part in military operations in Afghanistan, in the Iran-Iraq war, in armed conflicts in the territories of the former USSR and Yugoslavia. During these armed conflicts, 100-mm anti-tank guns are mainly used not against tanks, but as conventional divisional or corps guns.

The MT-12 anti-tank guns continue to be in service in Russia.
According to the press center of the Ministry of Defense, on August 26, 2013, with the help of an accurate shot with a UBK-8 cumulative projectile from the MT-12 "Rapier" cannon of the Yekaterinburg separate motorized rifle brigade of the Central Military District, a fire was extinguished at well No. P23 U1 near Novy Urengoy.

The fire started on August 19 and quickly turned into an uncontrollable fire breaking through faulty fittings natural gas. The artillery crew was transferred to New Urengoy by a military transport aircraft taking off from Orenburg. At the Shagol airfield, equipment and ammunition were loaded, after which the artillerymen under the command of a control officer missile forces and artillery of the Central Military District, Colonel Gennady Mandrichenko, were delivered to the scene. The gun was set for direct fire from the minimum permissible distance of 70 m. The target diameter was 20 cm. The target was successfully hit.

In 1967, Soviet experts came to the conclusion that the T-12 gun “does not provide reliable destruction of the Chieftain tanks and the promising MVT-70. Therefore, in January 1968, OKB-9 (now part of Spetstekhnika JSC) was ordered to develop a new, more powerful anti-tank gun with the ballistics of the 125-mm D-81 smoothbore tank gun. The task was difficult to complete, since the D-81, having excellent ballistics, gave strong recoil, which was still tolerable for a tank weighing 40 tons. But during field tests, the D-81 fired a 203-mm B-4 howitzer from a tracked carriage. It is clear that such an anti-tank gun weighing 17 tons and a maximum speed of 10 km/h was out of the question. Therefore, the recoil in the 125 mm gun was increased from 340 mm (limited by the dimensions of the tank) to 970 mm and a powerful muzzle brake was introduced. This made it possible to install a 125-mm cannon on a three-frame carriage from the serial 122-mm D-30 howitzer, which allowed all-round firing.

The new 125-mm gun was designed by OKB-9 in two versions: the towed D-13 and the self-propelled SD-13 (“D” is the index of artillery systems designed by V.F. Petrov). The development of the SD-13 was the 125-mm smoothbore anti-tank gun "Sprut-B" (2A-45M). The ballistic data and ammunition of the D-81 tank gun and the 2A-45M anti-tank gun were the same.

The 2A-45M gun had a mechanized system for transferring it from combat position in the stowed and back, consisting of a hydraulic jack and hydraulic cylinders. With the help of a jack, the carriage was raised to a certain height necessary for spreading or bringing the frames together, and then lowered to the ground. Hydraulic cylinders lift the gun to maximum ground clearance, as well as raise and lower the wheels.

Sprut-B is towed by a Ural-4320 vehicle or an MT-LB tractor. In addition, for self-propulsion on the battlefield, the gun has a special power unit based on the MeMZ-967A engine with hydraulic drive. The engine is located with right side guns under the casing. On the left side of the frame, the driver's seats and the gun control system for self-propulsion are installed. Maximum speed while on dry dirt roads - 10 km / h, and transportable ammunition - 6 shots; cruising range for fuel - up to 50 km.

The ammunition load of the 125-mm Sprut-B cannon includes separate-case-loading rounds with cumulative, sub-caliber and high-explosive fragmentation shells, as well as anti-tank missiles. The 125-mm VBK10 round with the BK-14M cumulative projectile can hit tanks of the M60, M48, and Leopard-1A5 types. VBM-17 shot with a sub-caliber projectile - tanks of the M1 Abrams, Leopard-2, Merkava MK2 type. The VOF-36 round with the OF26 high-explosive fragmentation projectile is designed to destroy manpower, engineering structures and other targets.

With special guidance equipment, the 9S53 Sprut can fire ZUB K-14 rounds with 9M119 anti-tank missiles, which are controlled semi-automatically by a laser beam, the firing range is from 100 to 4000 m. The mass of the shot is about 24 kg, the missiles are 17.2 kg, it pierces armor behind dynamic protection with a thickness of 700-770 mm.

Currently, towed anti-tank guns (100- and 125-mm smoothbore) are in service with countries - former republics of the USSR, as well as a number of developing countries. The armies of leading Western countries have long abandoned special anti-tank guns, both towed and self-propelled. Nevertheless, it can be assumed that towed anti-tank guns have a future. Ballistics and ammunition of the 125-mm Sprut-B cannon, unified with the guns of modern main tanks, are capable of hitting any serial tanks peace. An important advantage of anti-tank guns over ATGMs is a wider selection of means of destroying tanks and the ability to hit them at point-blank range. In addition, "Octopus-B" can be used as a anti-tank weapons. Its OF-26 high-explosive fragmentation projectile is close in ballistic data and explosive mass to the OF-471 projectile of the 122-mm A-19 hull gun, which became famous in the Great Patriotic War.

$mob_info$