Vladimir Putin promised to allocate one billion rubles annually to support talented youth. Supporting talented youth Supporting young talents

GOVERNMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

RESOLUTION

About the National Coordination Council for the Support of Young Talents of Russia

Lost force on November 21, 2018 based on
Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of November 10, 2018 N 1341
____________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________
Document with changes made:
(Official Internet portal of legal information www.pravo.gov.ru, 07/03/2017, N 0001201707030011).
____________________________________________________________________

Government of the Russian Federation

decides:

1. Form a National Coordination Council to support young talents in Russia.

2. Approve the attached Regulations on the National Coordination Council for the Support of Young Talents in Russia.

Chairman of the Government
Russian Federation
D.Medvedev

APPROVED
Government resolution
Russian Federation
dated September 10, 2012 N 897

1. The National Coordination Council for the Support of Young Talents of Russia (hereinafter referred to as the Council) was formed to ensure coordinated actions of federal executive authorities and executive authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation aimed at implementing a nationwide system for identifying and developing young talents.

2. The Council in its activities is guided by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, federal constitutional laws, federal laws, decrees and orders of the President of the Russian Federation, decrees and orders of the Government of the Russian Federation, as well as these Regulations.

3. The main objectives of the Council are:

a) coordination of the implementation of the Concept of a national system for identifying and developing young talents, approved by the President of the Russian Federation on April 3, 2012 N Pr-827;

b) development of proposals for the integration of mechanisms for searching and supporting gifted children and youth into the national system for identifying and developing young talents;

c) identification, support and dissemination of the best practices of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation in terms of the implementation of regional and municipal programs for working with gifted children and youth;

d) preparation of expert opinions, proposals and recommendations for creating conditions that ensure the development and realization of the abilities of children and youth in order for them to achieve outstanding results in their chosen field of professional activity.
(Subclause as amended, put into effect on July 11, 2017 by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation dated June 24, 2017 N 741.

4. When carrying out its activities, the Council has the right:

a) invite representatives of federal bodies to their meetings state power, government bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local governments, representatives of scientific, educational and public organizations, mass media;

b) create, on issues within its competence, working and expert groups from among representatives of federal government bodies, government bodies of constituent entities of the Russian Federation, representatives of scientific, educational and public organizations, scientists and specialists, and also approve their composition;

c) request, in the prescribed manner, from federal executive authorities, executive authorities of constituent entities of the Russian Federation and local governments information materials on issues within the competence of the Council;

d) consider initiatives of citizens of the Russian Federation and public organizations aimed at the effective implementation of the Concept specified in subparagraph “a” of paragraph 3 of these Regulations.

5. The Council includes representatives of federal government bodies, honored figures of education, science, art, culture and sports.

The Chairman of the Council is the Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation. The Chairman of the Council has 2 deputies.

The Deputy Chairmen of the Council carry out (on instructions from the Chairman of the Council) the functions of the Chairman of the Council in his absence.

6. The composition of the Council is approved by the Government of the Russian Federation.

7. The Council carries out its activities in accordance with the work plan, which is adopted at a meeting of the Council and approved by its chairman. The procedure for the work of the Council is determined by its chairman or, on his instructions, by the deputy chairman of the Council.

The activity plans of the working groups are approved by their leaders in accordance with the work plans of the Council.

8. The main form of activity of the Council is the meeting.

Meetings of the Council are held under the leadership of the Chairman of the Council or (on his instructions) the Deputy Chairman of the Council at least 2 times a year in accordance with the plan of its work, as well as by decision of the Chairman of the Council.

A meeting of the Council is considered valid if at least half of its members are present.

9. Members of the Council participate in its work personally. Delegation of authority is not permitted.

Members of the Council carry out their activities free of charge.

10. The executive secretary of the Council informs the members of the Council about the place and time of the meeting of the Council and its agenda.

Members of the Council who have proposals for the agenda of the meeting of the Council send them to the executive secretary no later than 5 days before the day of the meeting.

11. Council decisions are made by open voting. A decision is considered adopted if a majority of the Council members present at the Council meeting vote for it. In case of equality of votes, the decision voted for by the person presiding at the meeting of the Council is considered adopted.

12. Decisions made at a meeting of the Council are documented in minutes, which are signed by the chairman of the meeting. Minutes of the Council meeting are kept by the executive secretary.

A copy of the minutes of the Council meeting is sent to Council members and other interested parties no later than one month from the date of the meeting.

13. Organizational, technical and information support for the activities of the Council is provided by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation.

Revision of the document taking into account
changes and additions prepared
JSC "Kodeks"

Identification and support of young talents in the field of culture and art is a grant area introduced in 2018 by decision of the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin.

This direction involves the implementation of large-scale projects: creative competitions and festivals that involve the search for and support of Russian young talents in the field of culture and art.

The competition project in this area consists of two equal parts. This mechanism for identifying young talents and describing their further support.

Key features of the direction

Who can participate in the competition in this area?

Non-profit organizations with successful experience in implementing similar large-scale projects or with serious partners with such experience. At the same time, competition participants with their own significant experience have an advantage.

What should be contained in the competition project?

First of all, information about the two main components of the project: the mechanism for identifying young talents and the form of their further support.

How else does a project for the “competition of competitions” differ from projects submitted in the other twelve areas?

Geographical coverage. The project must involve the selection of talent across the country or at least several regions.
Team. To the project team or competition jury must include famous Russian cultural and artistic figures. Their participation in the project must be confirmed in writing (scans of letters are uploaded as part of the application).
Experience. The applicant or partner organization must have at least five years of experience in implementing similar projects.
Beneficiaries. The target audience of the projects is children and youth with exceptional creative abilities. The minimum age of possible project participants is 6 years, the maximum is 35 years (with justification as to why support is required at this age for the development of talent). We can talk not only about individuals, but also about creative teams.
Regranting. This is the only area in which regranting is directly permitted, that is, the opportunity, at the expense of the received grant, to issue grants, prizes, scholarships to young talents, buy them instruments, pay for education, travel, and accommodation. The amount of such payments must be clearly specified in the project, as well as the conditions for their award.
Co-financing. If an organization has been successfully selecting young talent for several years, the project cannot be aimed only at doing the same thing, but for additional money. The project must show in detail its own contribution to the project and the directions for spending the grant.

If the application does not contain specifics, for example, a description of the conditions and procedures for identifying and supporting talent, the names of cultural representatives participating in the project, or there are no letters confirming such participation, the application will not be accepted for independent examination.

If the application does not disclose the applicant’s experience, does not detail the budget, or specifies a small scale of activities, the application will most likely receive low points based on the examination results.

What if a non-profit organization is successfully helping talented children in its city or town, but has no plans to expand the scope of its work?

Nothing prevents such an organization from presenting a project in the direction of “supporting projects in the field of culture and art.” Here she will have a better chance of receiving a grant, since this is one of the twelve areas for which there are no established special requirements.

Filing an application

In order to apply for participation in the grant competition in the “identification and support of young talents in the field of culture and art”, you need to familiarize yourself with the following documents in detail:

regulations on the competition for grants from the President of the Russian Federation for the development of civil society;

presentation, which outlines the features of submitting an application and filling out a questionnaire for the grant direction “identifying and supporting young talents in the field of culture and art”;

instructions for filling out an application for participation in a competition for grants from the President of the Russian Federation for the development of civil society.

What do you need to do to apply?

Register on the website website.
Enter Personal Area and go to the “MY PROJECTS” tab.
Click on the “CREATE APPLICATION” button located on the right under the menu bar.
Proceed to fill out the application form.
In paragraph “1. Grant direction" select from the proposed list or line “identifying and supporting young talents in the field of culture and art”, or “identifying and supporting young talents in the field of culture and art is a long-term project”.

Please note that the grant direction for identifying and supporting talented children and youth involves the implementation of projects with both a standard implementation period and long-term ones (up to 3 years). When choosing a long-term project, it is necessary to justify the impossibility of implementing the project in a shorter period. More details about long-term projects can be found in Chapter VI of the regulations on the competition for grants from the President of the Russian Federation for the development of civil society.

Also among the priority tasks of the state youth policy in modern stage includes improving the system of encouragement and motivation talented youth, which is a strategic resource for the country's development.

The development of this system was positively influenced by measures implemented at the federal and regional levels. First of all – Decree of the President of the Russian Federation dated April 6, 2006. No. 325 “On measures of state support for talented youth.”

In accordance with the Decree, the annual identification of 5,350 young talents in all regions of Russia is provided. Of these – 1,250 people. (winners of All-Russian Olympiads, winners and prize-winners of international Olympiads and other events held on a competitive basis) receive bonuses in the amount of 60 thousand rubles. and 4,100 young people (winners of regional and interregional Olympiads, winners of All-Russian Olympiads and other events held on a competitive basis) - in the amount of 30 thousand rubles.

In 2015, another form of support for talented youth will be developed: from September 1, for 5 thousand school graduates who have demonstrated the most high level preparation, a special academic scholarship is being introduced for the entire period of study at universities in the amount of 20 thousand rubles.

Regional competitions aimed at identifying and supporting talented youth are held in 78 regions of Russia. The total number of competitions is 634.

The largest number of them is noted in the Tomsk region (44), Tambov region(43), Moscow region (40), Kaliningrad region (37), Chelyabinsk region (31). In total, more than 200 thousand young people participated in the regional stages. The number of winners in 2014 compared to 2012 increased by 25%.

Among the interregional competitions to identify and support talented youth, the following can be noted: competitions of projects and programs to support talented youth, creativity festivals, KVN games, photo competitions, pop song competitions-festivals, contemporary art festivals, exhibitions of creative works.

In accordance with the data of a monitoring study on young people taking part in competitions, festivals, olympiads and other events of an interregional, all-Russian and international scale to identify and support talented youth, in 2014, compared to 2012, the number of participants increased by 10%.

Various competitions in the vocational education system are also aimed at identifying and supporting talented youth.

Thus, more than 2 thousand students from 71 constituent entities of the Russian Federation of all federal districts took part in the All-Russian Olympiads of Professional Excellence.

It should be noted that there is a steady trend in the formation of a system of support for talented and initiative youth at the regional level. Support measures have a positive resonance and help increase the interest of young people in scientific and research activities in the country.

In the 2013/14 academic year, over 7.4 million students took part in all stages of the All-Russian Olympiad, including 1.77 million students at the municipal, regional and federal stages, which is 25% more than the year before.

In 8 international Olympiads in general education subjects Russian schoolchildren won 19 gold, 16 silver and 3 bronze medals. For the first time in the history of international Olympiads, Russia took 1st overall team place in the number of medals at the International Chemistry Olympiad. Also, for the first time in 2014, all members of the national geography team became winners of international awards. In the team competitions in mathematics, computer science, physics, and astronomy, national teams of schoolchildren of the Russian Federation entered the top five strongest teams in the world.

It should be emphasized that a stimulating factor for young people was the creation in most subjects of the Russian Federation, in accordance with the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of July 30, 2008 No. 1144 “On the Prize of the President of the Russian Federation in the field of science and innovation for young scientists,” councils of young scientists and specialists (hereinafter referred to as SMUS).

SMUS is a permanent collegial, advisory body under the head of the highest executive body state power of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation and is a youth meeting of representatives of scientific and educational institutions located on the territory of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation.

The Council performs expert and advisory functions in matters of youth policy and the scientific and educational sphere, staffing, development of an innovative economy, and represents the interests of young scientists and specialists. Currently, as part of supporting innovation and scientific and technical creativity (according to monitoring data), about 2.0 thousand student scientific societies operate in the regions, employing about 200.0 thousand people.

In Russia, a system of communication platforms has been created, the purpose of which is to generalize experience and develop the skills and competence of young people - a system of youth forums. In 2014, more than two-thirds of the regions of the Russian Federation held their youth forums in the main areas of state youth policy.

In pursuance of the order of the President of the Russian Federation of August 20, 2012 No. Pr-2218, youth forums are held in all federal districts under the auspices of authorized representatives. The federal youth forums “Seliger” and “Territory of Meanings” welcomed about 16 thousand young activists in 2014. In total, about 50 thousand people took part in the forum campaign.

Youth employment.

The complication of the situation of young people in the labor market is associated, first of all, with the global financial crisis and recession, which in one way or another affected all countries in the world. According to the report of the International Labor Organization (hereinafter referred to as the ILO) “Global Employment Trends in 2014,” in 2013 there were about 202 million unemployed people worldwide, of which about 74.5 million people. were young people under the age of 25. The youth unemployment rate was twice the global unemployment rate, at more than 13%.

According to the ILO report “Global Employment and Social Forecast: Trends 2015”, the number of unemployed is expected to increase by 3 million people in 2015, and by another 8 million people. over the next four years. The global youth unemployment rate is expected to increase to 13.1% in 2015 and then remain unchanged until 2018. Greatest growth youth unemployment in 2015 will be observed in East Asia and the Middle East, with further increases expected over the coming years.

Secretary General The United Nations, Ban Ki-moon, called youth unemployment an “epidemic” today and “one of the major challenges of our time”: “In both poor and rich countries, the youth unemployment rate is significantly higher than that of adults. And of course, lack of work is just the tip of the iceberg. Many receive meager salaries and cannot count on social protection in the informal economy. Others find that their education prevents them from finding a job in today's job market."

In this situation, most of the activities within the framework of national youth policies in most countries of the world are related to youth employment.

And even more: youth employment in a number of countries has acquired the status of a national priority. This seems logical: the level of crime and migration among working youth is close to zero, working youth are ready to start a family and have offspring, continue their education, and are loyal to the authorities.

There is no doubt that the main responsibility for expanding youth employment falls on the state. Financing of youth employment within the framework of youth policy is almost entirely financed from state budgets, but there are also programs financed jointly by the state and private capital, international organizations ( World Bank, ILO, UN) and other donor organizations. The implementation of educational programs and entrepreneurship development programs in developing countries significantly depends on the resources of international partners and non-governmental organizations.

Thus, in 2011, the European Commission launched the Opportunities for Youth initiative, asking governments and social partners to make efforts to combat early school dropout and help young people get the necessary professional qualifications, skills and experience labor activity, and also in search of the first job.

Linked to this initiative is the EU Jobs Package adopted in April 2012, which complements employment priorities. These include a range of policy goals: a 75 percent employment rate for workers aged 20-64 by 2020; early school dropout rate below 10%; at least 40% of young people with higher education.

The goal of the “Your First Job” project is to support the labor mobility of young people within the common European labor market, namely, to promote the employment (work, internship or apprenticeship) of young people in EU member states. The project started in 2012. The result of the project should be the employment of 5 thousand citizens.

In 2012, the European Commission formulated a proposal to expand the Youth Employment Package. It included, inter alia, an invitation to Member States to adopt the Youth Guarantee, which was done in 2013.

The core of the initiative is for Member States to ensure that all young people under the age of 25 receive a quality offer of work, education, apprenticeship or training within four months of leaving school or last job. The International Labor Organization has estimated the cost of creating youth guarantees in Europe at 21 billion euros per year. At the same time, the economic damage from unemployment of 7.5 million young people was estimated at more than 150 billion euros, taking into account benefits paid to these young people and other long-term unemployment costs.

The “€6 billion youth employment initiative” was proposed by the European Council in 2013. Its goal is to help Member States improve national policy in the field of combating youth unemployment in countries where it exceeds 25%. AND Special attention be given to young people who do not study or work. The initiative is planned to be financed from the EU budget in the amount of 3 billion euros under the heading of youth employment and another 3 billion euros from the European Social Fund. Additional funds may be contributed by countries. The initiative will support and accelerate the Youth Employment Package and the Youth Guarantee.

National plans for the implementation of the Youth Guarantee initiative were presented by 18 EU Member States. National plans define the role government agencies authorities and other responsible organizations, financing and monitoring mechanisms, timing of implementation of activities. For example, in France, in 2006, the law “On Equal Opportunities” was adopted, which obligated companies of all forms of ownership to annually hire in proportion to the number of employees under 25 years of age, even if the latter did not have work experience in their specialty.

The Youth Guarantee initiative is complemented by three other EU initiatives: the European Apprenticeship Alliance, the Internship Quality Standards and the Community Employment Network.

The European Apprenticeship Alliance initiative aims to improve the quality of apprenticeships and the adoption of apprenticeships across Europe. In 2014, 19 people took part in this initiative European countries, about 30 organizations and 15 companies.

The Internship Quality Standards initiative, adopted in 2014, aims to ensure high quality internship training and fair working conditions for interns.

Thus, according to the European Trade Union Confederation, currently 59% of trainees are not paid, and 38% of trainees do not have a contract with an employer for an internship. Various youth organizations have also criticized the weak and non-binding nature of the EU initiative

The Community Employment Network initiative is one of the youngest, launched in September 2014 by decision of the European Council and the European Parliament. One of its tasks is to exchange knowledge and successful experience in implementing the Youth Guarantee initiative. Participation in the Network is not mandatory for European countries.

The European Erasmus Exchange Program for Young Entrepreneurs provides an opportunity for aspiring entrepreneurs to learn from established, experienced entrepreneurs in different countries around the world. In the program from 2009 to 2013. 5 thousand entrepreneurs took part.

Of all start-ups in the EU, about 87% were founded by entrepreneurs who took part in the Erasmus program. Funding for the program will continue, and by 2020 it is planned to provide at least 10 thousand exchanges of young entrepreneurs.

The analysis showed that the coordination of youth employment programs and plans in countries can be carried out through various organizational models involving the Ministry of Employment and/or Labour, the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Youth Affairs.

Thus, the main principle of China’s youth policy is work ethics, which is based on the involvement of young people in economic and labor activities. A special role here is given to the participation of students in labor camps, specially created for the summer holidays.

Among the measures taken by the PRC leadership to stimulate youth employment, the following should be noted: expanding employment channels, including encouraging and attracting university graduates to work in rural organizations; creation of their own business by university graduates (for the implementation of low-profit projects it is possible to obtain a loan of up to 100 thousand yuan); University graduates who have started running small businesses are exempt from paying administrative fees for three years; establishing connections between universities and enterprises (state order).

As a result of this policy in the PRC, despite the consequences of the global financial crisis, the overall level of employment of graduates six months after graduation educational institutions in the country is about 90.2%,

In most countries, the most popular interventions in programs to improve youth employability are: skills training (in particular professional education and apprenticeship systems) and comprehensive programs (for combining work and study, gaining work experience and other support activities), subsidies wages, community service, vocational guidance and employment, entrepreneurship training.

The main problem of developing and implementing such measures is assessing their socio-economic effectiveness for the labor market, specific beneficiaries of programs (young people), and the state.

Most programs were implemented in developed countries and middle-income countries, with only a small share occurring in developing regions such as Africa.

Measures to support youth depend on the income level of countries. OECD countries tend to have a diverse portfolio of programs, with comprehensive curricula popular among them, while middle-income countries are primarily focused on building and improving education and training systems.

The goals of the programs depend significantly on the level economic development countries In developing countries, there are more programs to help youth from low-income families, as they have relatively high unemployment rates and are often considered at risk. IN Latin America, where youth are most economically disadvantaged, comprehensive programs such as the Youth Program and targeted education programs funded by local governments, international organizations and the private sector have been supported and funded by the government.

Programs in transition countries target unemployed youth with low levels of education or out of school. About two-thirds of all programs in these countries focus on school leavers and students who have already completed their studies or will soon complete them.

Most of these programs focus on skills training and wage subsidies. There is limited data on programs for young women, young people with disabilities and young people from ethnic or minority groups.

In Russia, youth unemployment also exceeds average level unemployment of the population. According to the results of population surveys on employment problems “Employment and unemployment in the Russian Federation in February 2015” by Rosstat, on average among young people under the age of 24 the unemployment rate in February 2015 was 15.8%, including among the urban population - 15 .0%, among the rural population – 18.0%.

The average excess rate of unemployment among young people age group 15–24 years old compared to the unemployment rate of the population aged 30–49 years is 3.3 times, including among the urban population – 3.8 times, rural population – 2.4 times.

In general, the economically active population aged 15–72 years (employed + unemployed) in February 2015 amounted to 75.8 million people, or 52% of the country’s total population. The economically active population is 71.4 million people. classified as engaged in economic activities and 4.4 million people. – as unemployed using ILO criteria (that is, did not have a job or gainful occupation, were looking for work and were ready to start work in the survey week).

Comparative sociological research conducted by the Department of Youth Sociology of the ISPI RAS, show that in general, work still remains a significant factor in the personal self-determination of the majority of young people. A significant part of young people associate their current and later life. At the same time, every fourth person has a different orientation, not related to work. Among them, approximately every seventh young person would definitely not work if he were financially secure. This group has been steadily reproducing over the past decade.

Data analysis also shows that, firstly, opportunities for the integration of youth into the world of work and the formation of labor potential different groups youth often develop spontaneously and chaotically, under the influence of random factors; secondly, a factor in socio-professional advancement is involvement in informal and corporate connections. All this distorts the labor mobility of young people and introduces uncertainty into the conditions of their social and professional development. This is especially acute in today’s conditions of implementation of the import substitution program and further modernization of the economy. Solving these problems requires not only the active inclusion of young people in the labor process, but also new knowledge, qualifications, the ability to solve problems of increasing complexity, and the formation of modern work ethics among young people.

Distinctive feature The motivation for the work of young people is its instrumentalization. In relation to work and profession, the majority of young people are dominated by pragmatic values. A strong connection between work and earnings has formed in the minds of the majority (three quarters) of Russian youth (59.6% of young people aged 18–24 years and 65% aged 25–29 years).

Profession is also perceived instrumentally. A sense of usefulness, that is, the social significance of work, is inherent in a little more than a quarter of young people. Even fewer (12.1%) see the meaning of work in the realization of the internal need to work, as well as in the realization of creative potential (9.2%). For everyone else, a profession is a tool for achieving material well-being.

At the age of 25–29, only a third of young people associate the anticipation of an interesting job, their usefulness and the development of professional qualities with difficulty. And only 12.1% of young people see work as a way to realize their entrepreneurial potential.

The overwhelming majority of young people declare their refusal to realize their interest in entrepreneurial activity through labor. This indicates the imperfection of existing market relations in Russia.

The labor potential of young people is determined by the coincidence of their expectations in the world of work with the possibilities of satisfying them. The basic indicators of opportunities are the following: finding a job, improving qualifications, promotion, protection of labor rights. A comparative analysis over the past 12 years generally indicates a significant increase in the listed opportunities.

At the same time, nominally only half of young people rate them above average. And the possibility of creating or expanding own business even less and amounts to 26.1%. This means that for half of young people, opportunities have not become a reality. Existing more in a declarative form, they do not activate interest in work, undermining the labor potential of young people. As a result, the labor sphere is giving way to more efficient non-labor mechanisms.

One of the forms of temporary employment of young people is work in student groups.

The Ministry of Education and Science of Russia interacts with the All-Russian Youth Public Organization "Russian Student Teams" (hereinafter - MOOO "RSO"), which unites more than 240 thousand participants from 72 constituent entities of the Russian Federation, working in 6 main areas of activity: construction, pedagogical, agricultural, service , specialized, as well as teams of conductors.

During the summer work semester of 2014, representatives of student teams took part in the construction of the Plesetsk and Vostochny cosmodromes; residential microdistrict "Academic" (Ekaterinburg); nuclear industry facilities (Leningrad NPP, Rostov NPP, Novovoronezh NPP-2); upgrading of the Cenomanian-Aptian deposits of the Bovanenskovskoye oil and gas condensate field in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug.

Also, as part of interaction with the Federal Passenger Company OJSC, 7,800 students – representatives of student teams of conductors – were employed in 10 branches of the company. One of the priority projects in 2014 was the formation of specialized energy student teams of JSC Rosseti; a detachment with a total number of 1,500 students from 76 specialized professional educational organizations and educational organizations of higher education was formed.

In 2014, work continued on training volunteers to work at the XXII Olympic Games winter games and the XI Paralympic Winter Games 2014 in Sochi (hereinafter referred to as the Games). To train volunteers, 26 volunteer centers were created on the basis of educational institutions of higher education, which trained 25,000 Games volunteers.

In 2014 Federal agency for youth affairs, more than 900 practices and projects promoting the professional self-determination of youth, implemented in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, were collected and summarized.

Ministry of Education and Science of Russia together with International Association corporate education (hereinafter referred to as IACS), the I All-Russian competition of the best practices of employers in working with children, youth and personnel reserves (hereinafter referred to as the Competition) was held, aimed at creating a positive image of industries and professions, educating a new generation of citizens with the necessary professional and social competencies, formation of innovative methods of interaction between government bodies, organizations and public associations in the field of supporting children and youth. 49 companies operating in the Russian Federation took part in the Competition.

Based on a qualitative analysis of measures (activities) and a quantitative analysis of countries and youth employment programs, the following main conclusions can be drawn, namely:

1. Education and training are the dominant measure (activity) in youth employment programs.

2. Programs for the integration of young people into the labor market in developing countries of the world are aimed at young people with low incomes or poorly educated.

3. Information about youth employment activities is better covered in the industrialized countries of the world.

4. In general, the degree of socio-economic effectiveness of measures (measures) to ensure youth employment is assessed as weak, while these measures are more successful in developing countries and countries with economies in transition than in industrialized countries.

SUPPORTING TALENTED YOUTH IN THE FIELD OF CULTURE, CREATING CONDITIONS FOR INVOLVING A WIDE RANGE OF YOUTH IN THE ARTS.

T.V. Podlipaeva

Bogucharsky branch of the State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "VGPGK", [email protected]

The most important task of modern society is to provide children with a decent upbringing and education, which includes access not only to new knowledge and technologies, but also to the rich cultural values accumulated by human civilization.

Consequently, education is one of the categories of pedagogy, without which there would be no society. The role of education is very important in a person’s life, because it shapes personality. The purpose of education is the comprehensive development of the individual. And education is considered as a process of acquiring knowledge, skills and abilities. Education depends on economic, cultural and national traditions.

An integral component of modern state youth policy is the development of artistic creativity and support for talented youth, which are also identified as part of the priority national project"Education".

Talents create a special creative tension among young people and in society as a whole, stimulating the creative activity of their immediate environment. The search for talent, the creation of conditions for their development and subsequent application, as well as the willingness of society to accept talent and recognize innovative leaders is not just a matter of the country’s prestige, but an integral part of cultural and educational policy, without the systematic implementation of which the problem of creating an innovative economy cannot be solved.
Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation D.A. Medvedev in the article “Forward Russia!” (published on September 10, 2009) states: “Of course, an innovative economy will not arise immediately. She is part of a culture based on humanistic values. On the quest to transform the world for the sake of best quality life, for the sake of liberating a person from poverty, disease, fear, injustice. Talented people who strive for renewal, capable of creating new and better things, will not fly to us from another planet. They are already here, among us. And this is clearly evidenced by the results of international intellectual Olympiads, the patenting abroad of inventions made in Russia, and the real hunt being carried out largest companies and universities of the world, behind our the best specialists. We – the state, society and family – must learn to find, raise, educate and take care of such people.”
The professional development of talented and gifted children requires special approaches.

A certain system of support and development of talented children and youth has been formed and operates in the country.
At the federal level, preferences for gifted children - winners of Olympiads are legislatively enshrined: the Law “On Education” provides benefits for admission to educational institutions of higher and secondary vocational education for winners and prize-winners of the final stage of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren, members of national teams of the Russian Federation who participated in international Olympiads in general education subjects, winners and prize-winners of school Olympiads. The procedure for providing benefits to winners and prize-winners of Olympiads for schoolchildren upon admission to institutions of secondary and higher vocational education is based on a direct correlation of the level of the Olympiad with its quality indicators, that is, winners and prize-winners of Olympiads of a higher level (level I is considered the highest) have priority in receiving benefits.
Great importance has a subprogram “Gifted Children” of the Federal Target Program “Children of Russia”. Within the framework of the subprogram, a system of all-Russian mass events(from the level of educational institutions to the federal level), aimed at identifying, developing and supporting gifted children. One of the most effective forms of work to identify, develop and support gifted children is the development of the Olympiad movement and a system of creative competitions. In order to create a favorable environment for the manifestation and development of the abilities of each child, changes have been made to the regulatory documents regulating the conduct of the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren, providing for maximum coverage of students through the effective organization of the school stage of the Olympiad based on uniform approaches to its conduct, preparation of tasks and testing of work.
It should be noted that artistic culture occupies the most important place in the life of society, a decrease in its level creates a spiritual vacuum and violates the principles of normal development of society. Art is the meaningful core of artistic culture, one of the main mechanisms for understanding a person and the reality around him, and forming a system of his value systems. For children, the perception of art is one of the ways to master the world, significantly influencing the development of their personality.
The current direction of modern pedagogy is art pedagogy, introducing children to the best examples art of various types and genres. This type of pedagogy contributes to the development of the child as an individual, and also helps to master the material of certain disciplines (for example, literature, MHC, etc.).
The problem of introducing students to art can be solved by using high-quality programs and technologies, with a high level of professional training of teachers leading art classes, additional education teachers and their interaction with the entire teaching staff.

The effectiveness of introducing children to art increases significantly if the actions of all participants are coordinated pedagogical process. No less important is the participation of parents in this interesting work, involving them together with their children in richest world art. Teachers ensure the expansion of the child’s cultural space - organizing joint visits with parents to musical theaters and art museums. Visiting theaters and historical and architectural ensembles is also associated with the impact on the child of various types of art: architecture, painting, sculpture, music, artistic expression. Children absorb a variety of artistic impressions, this contributes to the amplification and enrichment of their artistic and general cultural development.
Boguchar city Voronezh region in the cultural development of youth it is not inferior to the regional center. So, in 2015, quite a lot of cultural and public events took place, both at the level of the Bogucharsky branch of the All-Russian State Public Park and at the district level.

For example, on May 16, 2015, the Bogucharsky District Museum of History and Local Lore joined the International “Night of Museums” event. The main theme of the evening was the Great Victory of the Soviet people over the Nazi invaders.The “night” at the Bogucharsky Museum began with a costumed sightseeing tour of its three halls. Guests of the museum learned the main milestones in the history of the Bogucharsky region, had the opportunity not only to carefully examine the exhibits, but literally “touch history.” As a souvenir, visitors took original photographs against the backdrop of the exhibitions, transforming themselves either into peasants in embroidered shirts or into Red Army soldiers. In the first hall of the museum, the master class “Dolls - Angels” was conducted by a craftswoman from the House of Folk Art and Crafts. In the second hall, guests unanimously sang along with the soloists of the Yubileiny Children's Palace of Culture songs of the war years, and in the third hall there was a “cinema” - recordings of regional events “Victory Salute”, “Victory Parade - 2015”, auto-motorcycle race “Russia. Glory. Memory”, as well as a film about our fellow countryman N. L. Novikov and his search party “Memory” - “The month is bright over Dubrava”.

On May 27, the central regional library opened its doors for “BiblioNight 2015”. The main topics were: “Year of Literature 2015” and “70th Anniversary of the Great Victory”. The program includes excursions around the library: theatrical performances, a literary cafe with tasting, a poetic flash mob, literary characters, magic tricks, master classes, exhibitions of librarians' handicrafts and their culinary talents, songs, dances, round dances, and a children's playground.

Also this spring, a presentation of the film “Slavyanka Doesn’t Say Goodbye” took place in Boguchar in a solemn atmosphere. March for all times”, studio “River Lena”. The program included not only a film screening, but also a performance people's artist Yu. Nazarov and Honored Artist of Russia L. Maltseva. Students of schools and the Bogucharsky branch of the VSPGK were able to personally meet the artists.

On August 25, the opening of the first open poetry festival “Petrovsky Pier” took place on the banks of the Bogucharka River. At the opening there were poets and bards from Bogucharsky, Kantemirovsky, Petropavlovsky, Verkhnemamonsky, Kalacheevsky and Rossoshansky districts. Bogucharsky poets of the Blue Bird club took part in the opening.

In the fall, the Orthodox Culture Festival “Blagovest” was held in the church in the village of Sukhoi Donets, Bogucharsky district. A divine service, a concert of spiritual chants and a demonstration of bell ringing were held here.

And just recently, on December 4, 2015, a local history conference for students of the area’s schools, “The History of Boguchar in Persons,” was held in the museum’s exhibition hall. The purpose of the conference is to attract the attention of the younger generation to the study of history native land and the role of individuals in it. Of course, there are many famous names that have glorified Boguchar: Afanasyev, Sholokhov, Platonov, Kishchenko and many others. But everything about them has long been studied and described. The task of the conference participants is to find those who have made a significant contribution to the development of our region, but few people know about them. The local history conference will be held annually, which will give other children interested in the history of the development of their native land the opportunity to take part in the conference and show their knowledge and skills.

And as practice has shown, art has become a powerful tool for the socialization of the individual, the holistic social education of a person, his emotional and intellectual development, familiarization with the ethical emotional experience accumulated by humanity, with age-old wisdom, specific social interests, and ideals.

Folk artistic creativity is one of the important forms of preserving and transmitting accumulated socio-historical and pedagogical experience, spiritual and moral culture from one generation to another.

The process of introducing children and adolescents to folk art, to the traditions of folk artistic culture as a whole, takes place in school, preschool, and out-of-school institutions. The system of mastering artistic traditions is carried out at three levels: perception, reproduction and creativity. There are three groups of forms of personal involvement in folk art: mass forms of work, collective and individual.

Additional education is one of the means of introducing teenage children to folk art. The content of additional education for children reflects: the recreational and health development of the child; organization and formation of new social experience; psychological and pedagogical assistance and support for children in individual development. The specifics of additional education provide a wide range of humane interpersonal interaction in socially popular communities and societies, develop adolescents’ attitudes towards positive communication as a means of successful development of their self and improvement of moral and business relations in modern society.

Literature

Golovanov V.P. Methods and technology of work of a teacher of additional education: textbook. A manual for students of institutions of secondary vocational education / V.P. Golovanov. M.: Humanitarian Publishing Center VLADOS, 2004. 239 p.
Model provision on educational institution additional education of children (approved by Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 7, 1995 N 233) (as amended on February 22, 1997, August 8, 2003, February 1, 2005, December 7, 2006).
Federal Law of the Russian Federation “On Education” dated July 10, 1992 N 3266-1 (as amended on November 10, 2009).
mboguchar.ru>Articles>Creativity and culture.

The meeting was extremely representative; education experts rarely gather in such a composition. And although the audience was dominated by rectors - Viktor Sadovnichy, Mikhail Strikhanov, Nikolai Kudryavtsev, Vitaly Rubtsov, Anatoly Alexandrov, Yaroslav Kuzminov and others, there were also State Duma deputies (Alexander Degtyarev, Oleg Smolin, Irina Rodnina) and heads of public organizations. The Ministry of Education and Science was represented by Deputy Minister Igor Remorenko, who oversees school education and youth policy.

At the very beginning of the meeting, Olga Golodets recalled that last spring a set of measures was adopted to implement the Concept of a national system for identifying and developing young talents, but many of the tasks have not yet been solved - for example, requirements for pre-professional education programs in the field of arts have not been developed. However, at the meeting of the National Coordination Council, the emphasis was placed on other issues: what needs to be done nationwide to identify gifted children, including how to improve the system of intellectual competitions for schoolchildren and students.

Are children from rich families the most gifted?

The results of the first all-Russian study attitudes of citizens towards talent - on the initiative of the Higher School of Economics field work conducted by the Public Opinion Foundation. The results, according to the managing director of the fund, Elena Petrenko, were surprising even for sociologists.

Among the main conclusions is the end of the myth of the “equalist consciousness.” When asked whether you agree that culture is developed only by a few, the most talented people, 56% of respondents answered in the affirmative. “This means that society has come out of the Soviet overcoat, we have practically parted with egalitarian values,” says Elena Petrenko. “Our consciousness is not egalitarian.” And 36% of respondents agree that economic growth (and ultimately the well-being of each of us) is determined by the contribution of 3-5% of talented and energetic people.

The next section of the survey is who should pay for the development of the abilities of gifted children, and to what extent co-payments from parents are necessary. Less than a third of respondents in the “population” sample and a quarter in the “parents” sample are confident that the development of a child’s talents should be carried out by the family, and not the state. The importance of the state’s role in the development of talent is spoken of by 67% in the “population” sample and 73% in the “parents” sample. However, parents can take on maximum responsibility: 75% of respondents are ready to give up the benefits of life that are important to them for the sake of developing their child’s talent.

When asked whether you are willing to pay for additional education that will develop your child’s abilities, 33% of the most affluent part of the population (the top of the five quintiles) answer “yes, we are already paying”; the same answer is given by 37% of the slightly less affluent part (the second quintile) . According to HSE Rector Yaroslav Kuzminov, this is an important indicator: representatives of the first quintile pay less than representatives of the second. That is, social benefits go to those with high incomes - the free sector of talent support mostly includes children of very wealthy parents.

Another topic that was considered as part of the study was what school one should attend to develop giftedness. Most of respondents talk about the need to expand opportunities secondary school, less than a third are about developing a network of specialized schools and ensuring a transparent selection system for them. There is a contradiction: the majority wants their children to study in a regular school, but is skeptical about its capabilities for developing giftedness. And, as Elena Petrenko noted, the respondents’ answers reflect the current practice. The higher the income level of respondents, the more often they say that special schools are needed for gifted children.

However, when asked how children are recruited to such schools, the majority of respondents answer that you can get there not only thanks to your abilities, but also for a fee, through an acquaintance. In the top quintile, 14% say that special schools are selected primarily on the basis of ability, which means that children from such families actually learn. The wealthier the family, the more often children study in lyceums and gymnasiums - and exactly the opposite: the lower the level of family income, the less often the child ends up there.

Universities and Olympiads

Co-reports on improving the system of intellectual competitions to identify gifted schoolchildren and students were made by Yaroslav Kuzminov and the rector of the Moscow state university named after M.V. Lomonosov Victor Sadovnichy.

Yaroslav Kuzminov spoke about the responsibility of universities in the search for and cultivation of talents in the scientific and professional fields (sports and art were left out of the discussion). There are several problems here: the school is focused on mastering the general education program and does not encourage the acquisition of additional knowledge, olympiads are held only in school subjects, and children do not have the opportunity to try on professional roles. From a third to a half of students, even strong ones, come to the faculties of psychology, sociology or soil science by chance - they did not study the relevant subjects at school.

Universities are interested in strong students, and this interest will be stimulated by competition for government assignments based on admission quality indicators, which the Ministry of Education and Science will introduce starting this year. New law“On Education in the Russian Federation” for the first time allowed universities to engage in general education - to open their own lyceums and lyceum classes. However, the system of working with schoolchildren in specific universities is more focused on preparing applicants for themselves (mainly in paid preparatory courses) rather than on finding talented schoolchildren. And for efficient work With gifted children, universities have neither the base, nor the skills, nor the incentives, nor the resources. “We must try to change this model of behavior of universities,” says the HSE rector.

The work of universities with gifted schoolchildren is the selection of “ready-made” talents and the “cultivation” of talents, and the main form of this work today is the Olympiads. However, there are problems in the Olympiad movement: society doubts the objectivity of holding Olympiads (this is evidenced by regular appeals to the Public Chamber), but at the same time it seeks to use Olympiads as a way of non-competitive admission to a university. This needs to be countered by other actions, ensuring interest in participation in the Olympiads, starting from the elementary grades.

What are the directions of development of the Olympic movement?

It is necessary to improve the Olympiad system: strengthen control, ensure transparency, develop uniform rules that would not hamper initiative. It is necessary to expand the practice of project competitions in applied areas - analogues all-Russian competition“Step into the Future”, which is organized by Moscow State Technical University named after N.E. Bauman (MSTU). Project competitions can be held in other areas - agriculture, social work, management. In the same way, Olympiads can be held in pre-core subjects - from philosophy to medicine (today only engineering, economics and law are represented), and the “experience” of new Olympiads and competitions, allowing winners to receive benefits when entering universities, should be reduced to one of the year.

The coverage of schoolchildren in Olympiad competitions should be much greater - to attract children younger age, With disabilities health, from low-income families, remote areas. The most obvious way is to introduce quotas for different categories of children, involving regional public chambers in monitoring their use. As for the All-Russian Olympiad for schoolchildren, leading universities could participate in its holding - today, a number of areas of the “All-Russian Olympiad” are not very well organized: for example, children who did not participate in the school stage sometimes get to the regional stage. Public and methodological control on the part of universities would help solve many problems.

As for the Olympiads held by the Russian Council of Olympiads for schoolchildren, over the past three years the proportion of their participants from non-graduating classes has tripled. We need to further increase this share, also increasing the number of schoolchildren from different regions. One of the radical proposals is to publish on the Internet the works of all the winners of the Olympiads: despite the fact that this information can be considered personal, a person on its basis applies for a budget-funded place at a university and therefore is unlikely to object to its disclosure.

In 2014, the practices of financing and methodological control of the lyceum and lyceum classes at capital universities will be worked out. The Moscow government will transfer the standard per student to universities, and the universities will bear the rest of the costs themselves. Moscow State University, Higher School of Economics and the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN) will participate in the experiment, and this will be an attempt to create an alternative to elite schools. It is important that lyceums within leading universities remain free, and that quotas are allocated there for children from low-income families and families with low levels of parental education. In this way, social mixing will be carried out - the function that education performs in society.

"Avoid Competitive Individualism"

Viktor Sadovnichy, in turn, made a report on university Olympiads and other intellectual competitions. However, according to his own assessment, this task turned out to be more difficult, because there is virtually no system for supporting talented people in universities, and now we are at the origins of its formation. We need a trajectory for supporting talent, from school to work, and to create it we need “systemic integration of the school, university and employer.” There are examples of participation in supporting the talents of public organizations - such as the Russian World Foundation or the Russian Geographical Society.

There are different forms of work with gifted students - a science festival (the last one was attended by 400 thousand young people), Olympiads, Universiade, scientific conferences, summer and winter schools and others, universities here have limitless fields for work. However, students’ motivation to participate in such events “fades away” by the fifth year, because they think about work. Although, for example, our teams constantly take prizes in international student programming competitions. There are many other examples, but they cannot be considered systematic work. There is not even grant support for the participation of young people in Olympiads - everything is limited to diplomas and one-time bonuses. “We conducted a study of successful practices of intra-university support for gifted youth. The picture doesn’t make me happy,” said Viktor Sadovnichy.

During the discussion of the reports, various points of view and proposals were expressed.

Thus, Anatoly Alexandrov, rector of the Bauman Moscow State Technical University, said that if the Olympiads cause criticism, it is only among people who did not participate in them and cannot participate due to limited intellectual capabilities. Thanks to the “Step into the Future” competition, it is possible to find children with a special mindset, and then they need to be accompanied, individual development cards developed for them, and sent to practice in best universities Russia and abroad.

Chairman of the State Duma Education Committee Alexander Degtyarev proposed discussing the problem of competitive selection for high schools. In higher education, a group of leading universities has been identified; why can’t elite schools be identified in general education? The law gives schools the right to create lyceum and gymnasium classes, but the issue of selection for these classes is not specified, and this is not the prerogative of the law, but of regulations of educational authorities. And if enrollment in the first grade, of course, should be carried out on a general basis, then in grades 10-11 it is quite possible to select by competition, that is, “rank children according to the degree of giftedness.” And such classes will definitely become suppliers of applicants to the country's leading universities.

First Deputy Chairman of the Education Committee Oleg Smolin focused on the fact that in the pursuit of achievements, children often become victims of so-called “competitive individualism,” when “a person experiences joy from his own success associated with the defeat of another.” The deputy believes that social solidarity for the development of talent and creativity is no less important than a person’s desire to achieve: “I would venture to say that the experience of the USSR, Japan, South Korea, Finland shows that the overall high level of education of the population is no less, and perhaps even more important for the modernization of the country than individual outstanding achievements" Of course, it is necessary to select talented people and create good conditions for them, but as part of this strategy, it is necessary to achieve equality of opportunity - in particular, by allocating quotas for participation in Olympiads or studying in free gymnasiums at leading universities. Oleg Smolin suggested distributing to maximum amount schools best practices in working with gifted children - for example, dedicate one of the next meetings of the Coordination Council to the achievements of creative pedagogy, inviting such famous innovative teachers as Yamburg or Shchetinin to it.

Oleg Smolin was supported by the rector of the Moscow City Psychological and Pedagogical University Vitaly Rubtsov, who also proposed disseminating his experience the best teachers and schools: “Our teachers do not know how to work with gifted children, they do not know how to create conditions for them. Technologies and methods of working with giftedness in Russia are poorly developed.” And Yaroslav Kuzminov agreed that a program was needed to overcome the “disease of competitive individualism and loneliness”: “This is very important, and I am pleased that my traditional opponent Oleg Smolin and I think alike. I would go further and propose specific tools and activities - not only dissemination of the experience of creative pedagogy, but also other steps: for example, legitimizing competitions for teams and collective projects, which are now denied by the entire normative system of reward and evaluation of results, competitions for social projects, development of school self-government . Young people do not have the skills to coordinate, solve problems for others or for the benefit of others - let's think about this too, this fits within the framework of our activities to identify talents. We need talent not only from engineers, but also from social organizers.”

“We need to fundamentally change the education system”

The results of the meeting were summed up by Olga Golodets, who stated that in order to identify talents and giftedness in children, we need to fundamentally change the education system. Some types of giftedness “we just miss, we don’t see them.” The Deputy Prime Minister said that she recently traveled to Finland with a large delegation - “I thought that we big gap, but I didn’t think it was that big.” To ensure the quality of life of their nation, people have a different attitude towards the education system; they do not hesitate to offer a three-year course in home economics or a music course in high school, when playing in a vocal-instrumental ensemble is a compulsory discipline. After all, if a person has never played musical instrument, if his mother didn’t bring him, we don’t know whether he’s talented or not. Therefore, a child, while studying at school, must try himself at a good level in music, and in sports, and in many other things, and then say that he likes this or that.

It is clear that children can be talented at something, but talents sometimes combine in unexpected ways. Steve Jobs was not only a talented engineer, but also a designer. However, if a person has discovered the talent of an engineer and he studies at the appropriate school, then he will not be able to demonstrate his design abilities - and vice versa. But it is a unique combination of talents that can give a creative surge. In such cases, it is necessary not only not to interfere with the development of different talents, but also to be able to highlight abilities that the child may not realize in himself.

Olga Golodets proposed moving from words to deeds in addressing the issue of geographic and social accessibility - in particular, already this year, instructing the federal ministries that are the founders of universities to ensure access to admission for talented children from the outback. Each institution must show that it has made every effort to gather children from all regions of Russia: that representatives of these institutions went to the regions, looked at the children, saw the best and invited them. The Deputy Prime Minister believes that universities have the resources to organize such work.

Another conclusion is about the need to organize interaction between employers and talented students, as Viktor Sadovnichy spoke about. There are examples of employers trying to involve students in their research and development. It is necessary to create a data bank of such interaction, identify employers who provide systematic support to talented students, and include the activities they conduct in the area of attention of the National Coordination Council.

Boris Startsev, especially for the news service of the HSE portal

Photo by Nikita Benzoruk

$mob_info$